The government should not spend money on arts

the government should not spend money on arts In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, i think that the government authorities should dedicate a decent amount of money to spend on improving and maintaining the arts as it produces several social, cultural, economic benefits to the country.

The goverment spends a huge sum of money for museums, gallaries and visual and performing arts do you think the government should spend more money on more important things, or should the government keep putting alot of money on those cultural and arty attractions. As we should not want an established church, so we should not want established art 61 as cowen notes, when the government promotes its favored art, the most innovative creators find it more . Some people say the government should not put money in the arts, such as music, opera and paintings, but instead should spend money on construction of public facilities. Previous || next the holy virgin mary (mixed media) by chris ofili the issue: public funding for the arts nothing in the us constitution requires the government to spend taxpayer dollars to fund artistic expression.

Sample essay government & art many governments in the world spend large amounts of money on art which helps to develop quality in people’s life however, governments should spend money on other things rather than art. Some people enjoy arts and have financial capacity to spend money for arts however, these does not warrant concrete reason for artists to get an increased on their salary in conclusion, government should prioritize the allocation of the budget on the projects that directly affects people’s lives . Government interacts with the arts in various ways asserting that the government could decide how to spend its money and could withhold funds from artists whose . That means that federal government spending makes up a sizable share of all money spent in the united states each year federal spending: where does the money go .

Title: the government should not spend money on arts - the government should not spend money on arts introduction to what extent do you agree a heatedly-debated issue in my country today is whether the government should not spend money on arts, in this brief essay, i will explore two arguments often heard in this . Yes, the government should spend more each year rich country spending a certain amount of money is less an issue than a small, poor country spending the exact same amount, all else equal . My view would bewhether the government should fund the artists or not depends on the present situation of the country(that is to say, if the country is too poor, it would be irrational to spend money on them instead of some more crucial things such as education, food, etc). There are at least ten good reasons to eliminate funding for the nea: go to organizations that lobby the government for more money 52 not only has government arts agencies politicize art .

India is a country of rich art and culture and it beholds numerous marvels and astonishing art in its embrace but there is always clash of argument among people where some assert that government should spend money on art and those who presumes that the government should cope up with other important concerns. These days, the government spends a large part of its budget not only on public services, but also the arts although i agree that it is important to spend money on public services, i do not think spending on the arts is a waste of money. Thus, the government should be responsible for the tuition of arts-that is to say government should spend money on the arts in conclusion, with reference to this issue, my understanding is although we do not care for the arts to some degree, we can benefit form the arts. However, many other people feel that the government money spent on art is wasted, particularly when there are so many others demands on it this essay will look at the arguments and examine whether governments should spend money on art. Some people argue that the government should spend money on public services and facilities, but not on the arts do you agree or disagree the role of arts in modem life is unique, providing people with entertainment and yielding various psychological rewards, such as relief from stress.

The government should not spend money on arts

the government should not spend money on arts In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, i think that the government authorities should dedicate a decent amount of money to spend on improving and maintaining the arts as it produces several social, cultural, economic benefits to the country.

Free essays on should governments spend money on art when they have so many other important issues and concerns government should not spend money on national . Much of what the feds spend money on is either unnecessary or ineffective or both the sequestration and the shutdown force voters and politicians to engage in serious and hopefully . What if trump really does end money for the arts newt gingrich has the debate over federal arts spending seemed to roil support for the arts should not be a function of government. Should government fund the arts no more than they should fund worship nick gillespie | september 9, 2012 email share facebook you know, spend a lot of money on top of which they .

Should such a large amount of money be spent on art when it could be better spent on local public services such as health and education in an era of reduced government spending we need to . However, while it is true that the government should help artists, i would argue that spending money on artists is not a waste of money it is often said that art forms are an integral part of the nation's cultural heritage. Should the arts get taxpayers' money at all - especially in a time when other public services are being cut brings about more spending on the arts in total government subsidies in the uk are . Federal government money is not the best way to fund the arts the federal government should support the arts, arts organizations' $63 billion in annual spending where does the rest of the .

Should governments spend money on art, when they have so many other important issues and concerns arts have been enjoying one of the most important positions in our societies throughout the ages and governments have been spending a good amount of money since the time of kings. The government should not spend money on arts governments should spend money on improving public transportation many people in the world want their countries to be developed, and they want to have a good quality of life. I believe that money spent on art should come from the individual who wants the art government money should be spent on the things that are essential – healthcare, social services, better care for the elderly.

the government should not spend money on arts In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, i think that the government authorities should dedicate a decent amount of money to spend on improving and maintaining the arts as it produces several social, cultural, economic benefits to the country. the government should not spend money on arts In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, i think that the government authorities should dedicate a decent amount of money to spend on improving and maintaining the arts as it produces several social, cultural, economic benefits to the country.
The government should not spend money on arts
Rated 5/5 based on 36 review
Download

2018.